PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 94.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.40%
Less D&A growth vs. QRVO's 5.03%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 454.74%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -21.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-630.56%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QRVO is 186.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-254.29%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 94.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
148.12%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -91.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-117.81%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 1024.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
40.91%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -136.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -5421.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-16.10%
Negative yoy CFO while QRVO is 73.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-12.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -6.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
12.31%
Some acquisitions while QRVO is negative at -2302.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-920.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-71.82%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-28.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -102.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-252.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -422.01%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
41.38%
Stock issuance far above QRVO's 60.03%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
98.30%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QRVO's 24.25%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.