PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -68.77%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.80%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 1.63%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
56.86%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -219.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-16.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -15.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
238.74%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -43.99%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
89.81%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QRVO's 1206.20%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
82.81%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -1257.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
123.08%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -98.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
742.31%
Growth well above QRVO's 880.78%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-384.38%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 150.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
47.26%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -28.71%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-45.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 13.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
45.21%
Some acquisitions while QRVO is negative at -131.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
7.44%
Purchases growth of 7.44% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
211.18%
Liquidation growth of 211.18% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-45.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 17804.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.50%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -104.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -26.88%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.