PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.85%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 92.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.82%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 2.89%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
136.36%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -58.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
45.24%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 58.77%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-179.62%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -110.26%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-672.73%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -11.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-44.44%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 78.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
2200.00%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -5461.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-204.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -104.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
97.80%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -143.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-12.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -0.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-45.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 15.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 100.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
26.02%
Liquidation growth of 26.02% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
91.81%
Growth well above QRVO's 70.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-11.35%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 95.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-10.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
71.93%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -17.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-566.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 39.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.