PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 46.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
D&A growth well above QRVO's 1.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1300.00%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -119.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -35.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
336.76%
Well above QRVO's 98.95% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-785.71%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 86.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-132.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -106.07%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
305.88%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -73.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
339.29%
Growth well above QRVO's 492.56%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
108.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 5529.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
14.47%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 43.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 17.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
25.91%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. QRVO's 100.95%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
13.27%
Purchases growth of 13.27% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-46.44%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 75.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-796.06%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 65.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -39.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.79%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -52.39%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.