205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.81%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 48.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-15.81%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -31.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-133.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.19%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QRVO is 6746.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
22.58%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QRVO's 321.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-261.54%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -884.33%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-254.29%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 184.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-49.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -179.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
40.00%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -98.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -0.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-163.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -114.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-86.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 10336.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-118.37%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
105.93%
Liquidation growth of 105.93% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
94.86%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -924.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-152.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -158.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.21%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of QRVO's 99.87%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
-30.67%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 102.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-2.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -9.37%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.