205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -4.39%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.47%
Less D&A growth vs. QRVO's 4.47%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.00%
Well above QRVO's 104.50% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
48.00%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 38.91%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-572.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -218.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-95.83%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -173.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-219.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -104.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
120.37%
AP growth well above QRVO's 59.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-181.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -2.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-500.00%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -1361.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.04%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -15.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
65.44%
CapEx growth well above QRVO's 15.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-97.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -454.41%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-7.87%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.44%
Liquidation growth of 2.44% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
50.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QRVO's 108.74%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
25.17%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -194.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
9.62%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -31.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-314.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -71.43%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.