PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.09%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 11.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
12.15%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -0.49%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1300.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
14.86%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 13.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-109.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -269.56%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-320.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -368.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.33%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 55.53%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
72.73%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -89.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-75.90%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 80.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.86%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 127.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-17.54%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -28.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-34.76%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 27.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-50.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
38.29%
Purchases growth of 38.29% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
51.41%
Liquidation growth of 51.41% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
730.77%
Growth well above QRVO's 87.06%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
173.44%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 82.61%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-100.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 25.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.