PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -32.25%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
9.17%
D&A growth well above QRVO's 3.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
78.57%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QRVO's 1040.80%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-20.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -32.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
126.17%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -38.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.97%
AR growth well above QRVO's 119.58%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-47.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -284.41%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
121.05%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -3753.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
227.40%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -10030.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
83.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 417.94%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
56.45%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -52.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-32.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -6.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-76.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.79%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-112.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -253.34%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-272.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -618.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-39.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -15500.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
39.29%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -42.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
15.74%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -35.22%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.