PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.51%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -1.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.38%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -2.69%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-5666.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-8.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -46.80%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-105.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QRVO is 93.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3.33%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 90.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-72.20%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 55.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-19.05%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 95.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-11.29%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 82.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-117.24%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 314.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-26.17%
Negative yoy CFO while QRVO is 195.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-22.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -0.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
Purchases growth of 15.14% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
20.34%
Liquidation growth of 20.34% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-120.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 156.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
51.40%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 84.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
214.96%
We repay more while QRVO is negative at -1.28%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-35.90%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 87.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
14.86%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -8.24%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.