205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -67.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.84%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -4.60%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
95.38%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -249.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
67.74%
Less SBC growth vs. QRVO's 244.80%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-9488.89%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QRVO is 672.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-87.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -46.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-50.42%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -96.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-464.71%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 399.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-236.97%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 477.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1.59%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -90.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-43.19%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -21.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-1.55%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.30%
Purchases growth of 18.30% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
10.30%
Liquidation growth of 10.30% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
81.82%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -29.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
102.73%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 11.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
70.00%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -22.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
87.85%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -7.08%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.