PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -768.85%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.31%
D&A growth well above QRVO's 0.06%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-41.41%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-13.92%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -5.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4766.67%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -58.10%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1045.00%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -77.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
49.16%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 201.55%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-137.04%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
15.66%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -241.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
112.12%
Well above QRVO's 62.68%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-0.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -72.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
23.21%
CapEx growth well above QRVO's 0.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-400.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.72%
Purchases growth of 16.72% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.23%
Liquidation growth of 18.23% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-20.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -240.29%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
81.64%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -8.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-41.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 25.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.