PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 68.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -3.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Deferred tax of 49.29% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
55.88%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 105.93%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-227.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -139.35%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-38.62%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -105.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.69%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -798.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-670.00%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-261.98%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 4.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1650.00%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -94.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-47.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -31.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-8.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -15.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
6500.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. QRVO's 44002.11%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-89.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-22.87%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-566.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 2014.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-970.42%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 89.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
Issuance growth of 44.44% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
95.38%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QRVO's 33.65%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.