PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 323.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -2.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-19.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 208.90%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.43%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 1.58%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
108.15%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -1151.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-134.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -8406.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
72.62%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 162.45%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
232.47%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -94.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
96.78%
Growth well above QRVO's 92.34%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
102.42%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 1604.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
54.47%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of QRVO's 107.20%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
14.74%
CapEx growth well above QRVO's 27.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-98.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -86.59%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
56.87%
Purchases growth of 56.87% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.97%
Liquidation growth of 18.97% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.00%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -76.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -413.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
89.93%
Debt repayment growth of 89.93% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
281.54%
Stock issuance far above QRVO's 10.28%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-2266.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.