205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.23%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -230.24%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.51%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -0.52%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
61.18%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QRVO's 204.84%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-25.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -44.29%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-262.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QRVO is 236.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-277.50%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 138.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-726.09%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 47.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-87.25%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 318.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2910.00%
Growth well above QRVO's 109.26%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-1166.67%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 198.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
10.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 430.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-23.68%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -97.41%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
12.06%
Purchases growth of 12.06% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-13.74%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-186.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 225.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-993.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-52.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -51.82%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-347.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -0.01%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.