PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 102.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.21%
D&A growth well above QRVO's 3.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.36%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -170.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-10.34%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -0.80%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
738.30%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -69.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
194.70%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -32.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-21.58%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -76.12%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
569.23%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -372.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
7.12%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QRVO's 29535.34%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
103.13%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -70.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.36%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -58.95%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
9.42%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -23.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.73%
Purchases growth of 50.73% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10542.31%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -98.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
226.08%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -12647.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
90.85%
We repay more while QRVO is negative at -125.49%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-25.64%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 98.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-68.87%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.