205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -4311.35%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.44%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -0.09%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
42.53%
Well above QRVO's 14.67% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -9.88%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
100.69%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -182.41%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
47.52%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -1245.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
21.88%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 217.76%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
176.03%
AP growth well above QRVO's 220.32%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
137.09%
Growth well above QRVO's 86.49%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
318.64%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 739.69%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
119.08%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QRVO's 57.67%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-16.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 13.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 94.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-206.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -102.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-2.54%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 21.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.75%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QRVO's 34.83%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.