205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Net income growth under 50% of Semiconductors median of 17.21%. Jim Chanos would flag it as a serious shortfall in bottom-line expansion vs. competitors.
-2.17%
D&A shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.41%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-700.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
10.29%
SBC growth of 10.29% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
17.19%
Working capital of 17.19% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-94.12%
AR shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-96.23%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
115.38%
AP growth of 115.38% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
38.49%
Growth of 38.49% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
131.25%
Growth of 131.25% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
15.35%
CFO growth of 15.35% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-18.90%
CapEx declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
12.95%
Proceeds growth of 12.95% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-561.29%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-103.00%
Reduced investing yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-50.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-47.83%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-18.18%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.