PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
5.31%
D&A growth of 5.31% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-41.41%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-13.92%
SBC declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
4766.67%
Working capital of 4766.67% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
1045.00%
AR growth of 1045.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
49.16%
Inventory growth of 49.16% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-137.04%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
15.66%
Growth of 15.66% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
112.12%
Growth of 112.12% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-0.67%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
23.21%
CapEx growth of 23.21% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-400.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
16.72%
Purchases growth of 16.72% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
18.23%
Proceeds growth of 18.23% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-20.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
81.64%
Investing flow of 81.64% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-41.30%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.