PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.73 | 5.46
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
13.44%
D&A growth of 13.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
42.53%
Deferred tax growth of 42.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
100.69%
Working capital of 100.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
47.52%
Slight AR growth while Technology median is negative at -17.05%. Peter Lynch would question if peers more aggressively collect or if this firm invests in growth.
21.88%
Inventory growth of 21.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
176.03%
AP growth of 176.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
137.09%
Growth of 137.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
318.64%
A moderate rise while Technology median is negative at -24.18%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
119.08%
Positive CFO growth while Technology median is negative at -8.17%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
-16.21%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-206.54%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-2.54%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
53.75%
Buyback growth of 53.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.