205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-2.94%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
121.68%
Deferred tax growth of 121.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
21.28%
SBC growth of 21.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-268.71%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-118.57%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-73.63%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-239.39%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-58.05%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -1.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
35.55%
CapEx growth of 35.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-24.54%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
153.36%
Proceeds growth of 153.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-100.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
111.50%
Investing flow of 111.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.95%
Issuance growth of 21.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-28.50%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.