PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.48%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-1.96%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
155.56%
Deferred tax growth of 155.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-5.33%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
131.94%
Working capital of 131.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
81.25%
AR growth of 81.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
70.00%
Inventory growth of 70.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
52.78%
AP growth of 52.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
261.70%
Growth of 261.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
833.33%
Growth of 833.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
70.77%
CFO growth of 70.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-27.84%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
27.84%
Acquisition growth of 27.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
58.49%
Purchases growth of 58.49% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-69.92%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-24.74%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-168.39%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
1.75%
Issuance growth of 1.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-1.80%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.