205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.76%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-1.67%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
73.33%
Deferred tax growth of 73.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-7.04%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
242.42%
Working capital of 242.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
1160.00%
AR growth of 1160.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
16.67%
Inventory growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
176.47%
AP growth of 176.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-91.45%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-390.91%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
4.17%
CFO growth of 4.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
13.71%
CapEx growth of 13.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-13.71%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
5.81%
Purchases growth of 5.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
0.15%
Proceeds growth of 0.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
35.54%
Growth of 35.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
41.98%
Investing flow of 41.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.86%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.