PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-0.97%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-54.05%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-1.28%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
34.11%
Working capital of 34.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-10.74%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-276.47%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
49.57%
AP growth of 49.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
99.28%
Growth of 99.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
81.82%
Growth of 81.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
67.75%
CFO growth of 67.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-3.90%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Purchases growth of 60.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
64.84%
Proceeds growth of 64.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-302.63%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
362.95%
Investing flow of 362.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-100.80%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-55.83%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-3.19%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.