PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
0.33%
D&A growth of 0.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
52.63%
Deferred tax growth of 52.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-19.48%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
165.88%
Working capital of 165.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
125.45%
AR growth of 125.45% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
76.67%
Inventory growth of 76.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
18.64%
AP growth of 18.64% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
18200.00%
Growth of 18200.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
130.00%
Growth of 130.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
78.45%
CFO growth of 78.45% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-28.75%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
28.75%
Acquisition growth of 28.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-69.64%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-68.16%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-18.18%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-147.76%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-45.60%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
9.83%
Buyback growth of 9.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.