205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-0.97%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
185.19%
Deferred tax growth of 185.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-3.23%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
49.40%
Working capital of 49.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
430.95%
AR growth of 430.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-371.43%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
162.50%
AP growth of 162.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-82.87%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-517.39%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-8.03%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-21.36%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
21.36%
Acquisition growth of 21.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-33.10%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
15.29%
Proceeds growth of 15.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
68.13%
Growth of 68.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-28.20%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
Issuance growth of 105.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-4.18%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.