205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.10%
Net income growth of 6.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-1.69%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-5800.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
7.69%
SBC growth of 7.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
46.99%
Working capital of 46.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
74.03%
AR growth of 74.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
31.67%
Inventory growth of 31.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
68.52%
AP growth of 68.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-12.90%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
471.43%
Growth of 471.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
34.65%
CFO growth of 34.65% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-1.63%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.33%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
39.84%
Proceeds growth of 39.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-11600.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-210.13%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.27%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
2.39%
Buyback growth of 2.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.