205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Net income growth of 14.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-2.06%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
12.28%
Deferred tax growth of 12.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-21.43%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
231.82%
Working capital of 231.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-17.50%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
378.05%
Inventory growth of 378.05% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-41.18%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
358.10%
Growth of 358.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-23.08%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 5.42%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
71.83%
CFO growth of 71.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-11.20%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
11.20%
Acquisition growth of 11.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
50.05%
Purchases growth of 50.05% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
13.95%
Proceeds growth of 13.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-14.78%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
323.56%
Investing flow of 323.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-200.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-31.37%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-20.80%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.