205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-2.07%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-111.86%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-26.32%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
4400.00%
Working capital of 4400.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-28.95%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
195.77%
Inventory growth of 195.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-76.92%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
155.26%
Growth of 155.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-72.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
32.18%
CFO growth of 32.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
12.03%
CapEx growth of 12.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-12.03%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
1.51%
Purchases growth of 1.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-57.44%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
7.89%
Growth of 7.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-1027.69%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-20.21%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
5.12%
Buyback growth of 5.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.