205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.16%
Net income growth of 8.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-4.22%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
66.40%
Deferred tax growth of 66.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-14.29%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
1.48%
Working capital of 1.48% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
269.39%
AR growth of 269.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-73.53%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
555.56%
AP growth of 555.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-89.35%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-2485.71%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-1.84%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
20.86%
CapEx growth of 20.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-20.86%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-36.20%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
48.54%
Proceeds growth of 48.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
15.71%
Growth of 15.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-13.60%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.79%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
5.00%
Buyback growth of 5.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.