PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Deferred tax growth of 96.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-28.00%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
140.76%
Working capital of 140.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
19.70%
AR growth of 19.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
137.50%
Inventory growth of 137.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
291.67%
AP growth of 291.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
205.85%
Growth of 205.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-110.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
87.79%
CFO growth of 87.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-23.18%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
23.18%
Acquisition growth of 23.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-7.79%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-27.27%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-32.87%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-6000.00%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-9.52%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.