205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
2.47%
D&A growth of 2.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
55.77%
Deferred tax growth of 55.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-8.70%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
104.98%
Working capital of 104.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
1211.76%
AR growth of 1211.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-288.46%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-125.49%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
13.87%
Growth of 13.87% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
1150.00%
Growth of 1150.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
1.85%
CFO growth of 1.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
12.70%
CapEx growth of 12.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-12.70%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
89.25%
Purchases growth of 89.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
26.12%
Proceeds growth of 26.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
15.36%
Growth of 15.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
185.12%
Investing flow of 185.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-67.42%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.