PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -10.58%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.61%
D&A growth of 3.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
117.39%
Deferred tax growth of 117.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
45.24%
SBC growth of 45.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-174.23%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-161.64%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
185.15%
Inventory growth of 185.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-415.38%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-169.12%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
19.05%
A moderate rise while Technology median is negative at -11.25%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-48.39%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
22.29%
CapEx growth of 22.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
55.26%
Purchases growth of 55.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-26.77%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
96.62%
Growth of 96.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-22.06%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-48.60%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
297.37%
Issuance growth of 297.37% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
42.66%
Buyback growth of 42.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.