205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.23%
Net income growth of 7.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
3.49%
D&A growth of 3.49% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
675.00%
Deferred tax growth of 675.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
9.84%
SBC growth of 9.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
139.52%
Working capital of 139.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
109.01%
AR growth of 109.01% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-39.53%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
61.19%
AP growth of 61.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
154.92%
Growth of 154.92% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-320.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
62.24%
CFO growth of 62.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-13.15%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.40%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-87.37%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-1890.91%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-121.99%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-3.31%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
25.09%
Buyback growth of 25.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.