205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
3.00%
D&A growth of 3.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-112.90%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-28.36%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
24.31%
Working capital of 24.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
266.67%
AR growth of 266.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-25.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
211.54%
AP growth of 211.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-40.30%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
141.82%
Under 50% of Technology median of 1.54% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
10.91%
CFO growth of 10.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
47.54%
CapEx growth of 47.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-47.54%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-312.55%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
10.00%
Proceeds growth of 10.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
32.42%
Growth of 32.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-254.26%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
Issuance growth of 32.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
47.16%
Buyback growth of 47.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.