205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 12.13%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.40%
D&A growth of 0.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-70.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-27.54%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-630.56%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-254.29%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
148.12%
Inventory growth of 148.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-117.81%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
40.91%
Growth of 40.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
100.00%
Under 50% of Technology median of 0.63% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-16.10%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-12.31%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
12.31%
Acquisition growth of 12.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-920.08%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-71.82%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-28.23%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-252.33%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
41.38%
Issuance growth of 41.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
98.30%
Buyback growth of 98.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.