205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of Technology median of 2.20%. Jim Chanos would flag it as a serious shortfall in bottom-line expansion vs. competitors.
2.43%
D&A growth of 2.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
1300.00%
Deferred tax growth of 1300.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-27.54%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
336.76%
Working capital of 336.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-785.71%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-132.50%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
305.88%
AP growth of 305.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
339.29%
Growth of 339.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
108.77%
Growth of 108.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
14.47%
CFO growth of 14.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-25.91%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
25.91%
Acquisition growth of 25.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
13.27%
Purchases growth of 13.27% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-46.44%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-34.57%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-796.06%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
Issuance growth of 38.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
4.79%
Buyback growth of 4.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.