PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of Technology median of 0.77%. Jim Chanos would flag it as a serious shortfall in bottom-line expansion vs. competitors.
9.17%
D&A growth of 9.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
78.57%
Deferred tax growth of 78.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-20.00%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
126.17%
Working capital of 126.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
137.97%
AR growth of 137.97% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-47.48%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
121.05%
AP growth of 121.05% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
227.40%
Growth of 227.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
83.24%
Growth of 83.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
56.45%
CFO growth of 56.45% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-32.33%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-76.59%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-27.79%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-112.20%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-272.49%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-39.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
39.29%
Issuance growth of 39.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
15.74%
Buyback growth of 15.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.