205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Net income growth of 0.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
6.76%
D&A growth of 6.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-550.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
6.73%
SBC growth of 6.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
40.90%
Working capital of 40.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-538.89%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
16.95%
Inventory growth of 16.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
159.68%
AP growth of 159.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
71.68%
Growth of 71.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-177.42%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
20.60%
CFO growth of 20.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-47.25%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-23.87%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
1150.00%
Growth of 1150.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-8617.86%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
64.21%
Debt repayment growth of 64.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-23.53%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
23.30%
Buyback growth of 23.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.