205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 4.79%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
6.67%
D&A growth of 6.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-90.38%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-28.83%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
98.82%
Working capital of 98.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
74.68%
AR growth of 74.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
59.41%
Inventory growth of 59.41% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-63.51%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
359.38%
Growth of 359.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
61.63%
Growth of 61.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
38.46%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-3.39%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.89%
Purchases growth of 23.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-5.87%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-111.90%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
28.97%
Investing flow of 28.97% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
4.62%
Issuance growth of 4.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
41.77%
Buyback growth of 41.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.