205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
8.21%
D&A growth of 8.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
36.36%
Deferred tax growth of 36.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-10.34%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
738.30%
Working capital of 738.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
194.70%
AR growth of 194.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-21.58%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
569.23%
AP growth of 569.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
7.12%
Growth of 7.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
103.13%
Growth of 103.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
15.36%
CFO growth of 15.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
9.42%
CapEx growth of 9.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.73%
Purchases growth of 50.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
10542.31%
Growth of 10542.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
226.08%
Investing flow of 226.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
90.85%
Debt repayment growth of 90.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-25.64%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-68.87%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.