205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ADI's 3.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
134.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ADI's 3.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.59%
Negative EBIT growth while ADI is at 22.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.59%
Negative operating income growth while ADI is at 22.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
35.09%
Net income growth at 75-90% of ADI's 40.00%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
25.00%
EPS growth at 75-90% of ADI's 30.00%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of ADI's 30.00%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
19.32%
Share count expansion well above ADI's 8.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
19.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above ADI's 8.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-12.55%
Dividend reduction while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
14.29%
OCF growth under 50% of ADI's 102.38%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
6.22%
FCF growth under 50% of ADI's 86.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
38.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 79.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 45.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ADI stands at 41.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
258.23%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 258.23% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
99.65%
Below 50% of ADI's 1373.99%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
15.18%
Below 50% of ADI's 49.54%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-0.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ADI is at 22.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ADI is at 8.65%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-19.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
48.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 48.99% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ADI invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-12.16%
Firm’s AR is declining while ADI shows 2.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-8.02%
Inventory is declining while ADI stands at 10.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of ADI's 4.95%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-18.17%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.05%
Debt shrinking faster vs. ADI's 5.62%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ADI's 1.16%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.