205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.66%
Revenue growth under 50% of ADI's 6.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.13%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ADI's 5.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
26.01%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ADI's 16.22%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
26.01%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ADI's 16.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
30.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x ADI's 19.61%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
25.00%
EPS growth of 25.00% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 25.00% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
8.46%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ADI's 19.61%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
8.46%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ADI's 19.61%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-11.64%
Dividend reduction while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
10.43%
Positive OCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
36.00%
Positive FCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
54.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of ADI's 66.62%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
23.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 35.09%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
19.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of ADI's 22.25%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1572.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
250.38%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 250.38% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
41.03%
Net income/share CAGR of 41.03% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
2034.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.72%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.00% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-7.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ADI invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.12%
AR growth well above ADI's 1.20%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.04%
Inventory growth well above ADI's 0.79%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Asset growth above 1.5x ADI's 1.84%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.03%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.44%
We have some new debt while ADI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
SG&A growth well above ADI's 4.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.