205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.55%
Revenue growth similar to ADI's 2.60%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
1.98%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of ADI's 3.85%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-0.34%
Negative EBIT growth while ADI is at 6.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.34%
Negative operating income growth while ADI is at 6.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.09%
Net income growth under 50% of ADI's 10.06%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth at 50-75% of ADI's 16.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of ADI's 16.67%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.53%
Slight or no buybacks while ADI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.43%
Slight or no buyback while ADI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
28.73%
Dividend growth of 28.73% while ADI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
36.43%
Positive OCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
170.27%
Positive FCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 319.85%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 223.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 182.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32045.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 345.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
282.66%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 282.66% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
115.17%
Below 50% of ADI's 376.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
232.45%
Below 50% of ADI's 6037.54%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ADI is at 150.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.50%
Below 50% of ADI's 160.85%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 32.23% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-78.93%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ADI invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.83%
Our AR growth while ADI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.58%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.49%
Similar asset growth to ADI's 2.61%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
6.43%
Under 50% of ADI's 136.68%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
SG&A growth well above ADI's 2.61%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.