205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.39%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of ADI's 12.09%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
12.03%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of ADI's 16.23%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
24.89%
EBIT growth 75-90% of ADI's 28.96%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
24.89%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of ADI's 28.96%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
20.16%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ADI's 30.59%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
19.05%
EPS growth at 50-75% of ADI's 32.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of ADI's 30.00%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
1.79%
Share count expansion well above ADI's 0.76%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-1.12%
Reduced diluted shares while ADI is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.76%
Dividend reduction while ADI stands at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
28.75%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x ADI's 23.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
1975.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x ADI's 17.36%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 190.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 77.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
61.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 7.96%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
45.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 261.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
48.79%
Below 50% of ADI's 149.98%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-12.33%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
99.88%
Below 50% of ADI's 600.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
21.43%
Below 50% of ADI's 247.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
327.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 42.46%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
287.62%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 530.44%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
68.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 122.34%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-0.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ADI is at 30.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
81.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 81.51% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.12%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
1.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.53% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.02%
AR growth well above ADI's 3.93%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.93%
Inventory growth well above ADI's 5.44%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.68%
Asset growth well under 50% of ADI's 5.02%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.11%
Under 50% of ADI's 3.89%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.70%
We’re deleveraging while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.05%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ADI's 6.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.93%
SG&A growth well above ADI's 7.63%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.