205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.98%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of ADI's 7.79%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
7.66%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of ADI's 10.51%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
11.16%
EBIT growth 50-75% of ADI's 17.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
10.84%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of ADI's 17.32%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
11.70%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ADI's 19.36%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
12.70%
EPS growth at 50-75% of ADI's 19.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
14.52%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of ADI's 18.18%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-1.99%
Share reduction while ADI is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.05%
Reduced diluted shares while ADI is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.75%
Dividend reduction while ADI stands at 10.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
134.52%
Positive OCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
230.47%
Positive FCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
72.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 22.46%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
42.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of ADI's 53.95%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
22.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 13.14%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
292.55%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 128.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
19.41%
Below 50% of ADI's 55.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
3.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 25.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
83.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 23.64% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
86.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of ADI's 104.55%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
32.48%
Below 50% of ADI's 77.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
16.38%
Below 50% of ADI's 75.55%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
15.09%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
7.05%
Below 50% of ADI's 27.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
493.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 493.84% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
784467.57%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 121.67%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
50.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 20.37%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
2.27%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. ADI's 7.48%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
5.56%
Inventory growth well above ADI's 7.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.99%
Asset growth at 75-90% of ADI's 4.48%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.19%
75-90% of ADI's 4.90%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ADI's 3.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.44%
SG&A growth well above ADI's 4.52%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.