205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.27%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.91%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.83%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.21%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
16.89%
Dividend growth above 1.5x ADI's 0.19%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-11.95%
Negative OCF growth while ADI is at 19.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.67%
Negative FCF growth while ADI is at 22.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
48.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 102.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
14.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 49.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 20.32%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
133.26%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 223.94%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
54.69%
Below 50% of ADI's 111.58%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
35.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 13.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
117.46%
Similar net income/share CAGR to ADI's 110.62%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
45.49%
Below 50% of ADI's 115.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
9.10%
Positive short-term CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
21.96%
Below 50% of ADI's 270.84%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ADI is at 107.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-9.21%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ADI is at 89.66%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
651.36%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 174.93%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
165.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 45.18%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
79.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 29.20%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-19.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.91%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.14%
Positive asset growth while ADI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.66%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.85%
We increase R&D while ADI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.26%
We expand SG&A while ADI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.