PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.55%
Positive revenue growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.04%
Negative gross profit growth while ADI is at 1.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.71%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.27%
Negative EPS growth while ADI is at 133.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ADI is at 133.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while ADI cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-57.51%
Negative OCF growth while ADI is at 7.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-134.00%
Negative FCF growth while ADI is at 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
48.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 96.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 37.98%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-15.86%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
60.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 319.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
2.07%
Below 50% of ADI's 139.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-59.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ADI stands at 39.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
106.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 37.35% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2.74%
Below 50% of ADI's 42.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-45.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ADI is 47.93%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
81.59%
Below 50% of ADI's 357.82%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
117.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with ADI's 122.69%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
18.72%
Positive short-term equity growth while ADI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
299.12%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 148.79%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
50.60%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 70.07%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
18.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 33.24%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
77.72%
Our AR growth while ADI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.53%
Inventory growth well above ADI's 1.86%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-4.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.73%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ADI's 6.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.83%
SG&A growth well above ADI's 2.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.