205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.39%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 2.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.39%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 2.47%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.39%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 2.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.39%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 2.47%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
13.82%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.10%
Share change of 0.10% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.10%
Diluted share change of 0.10% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 20.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 20.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 20.46%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
116.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
116.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.