205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.95%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.95%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-383.16%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-383.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
90.00%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 62.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 60.98%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 60.98%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.51%
Share change of 1.51% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.51%
Diluted share change of 1.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
100.00%
Dividend growth of 100.00% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
8.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.00%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
8.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.00%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.69%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
163.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
163.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
19.04%
Equity/share CAGR of 19.04% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
19.04%
Equity/share CAGR of 19.04% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
19.04%
Equity/share CAGR of 19.04% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.