205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.61%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-80.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-97.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-38.74%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-37.50%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-13.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-13.82%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 51.56%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
39.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 51.56%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
34.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 25.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
184.89%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 155.87%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
184.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 155.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
405.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 118.63%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.